Saturday, 19 March 2016

Culture in Things fall Apart - African Literature


("To evaluate my assignment, click here")

Department of English
Maharaja Krishnkumarsinhji Bhavnagar University




Name:-                                   Parmar Milankumar L.

Roll No. :-                              14

Enrollment no.:-                 pg14101026

Course name:-                     African Literature

Topic of an assignment:- Culture in Things fall Apart

Submitted to :-                     Dr. Dilip Barad,
                                                  Head of the department
                                                  Department of English (MKBU)









Introduction

“Literature is the mirror of the society” which reflects the society and so the culture. Culture is the texture of any society and it is inseparable part of any society. The Things Fall Apart is one of the greatest novels written by Nigerian post-colonial writer Chinua Achebe. It was first published in 1958. It is the first African novel to get global critical acclaim. It is staple book in schools throughout the Africa and widely read and studied in English speaking countries.  The title of the novel is taken from a line in the poem Second coming by W B Yeats. (Wikipedia)

The novel presents the culture of the Ibo community in Nigeria. Achebe himself belongs to this culture thus we get the more appropriate and truer picture to the culture of the Ibos. Throughout the novel he celebrates the strength of his own culture, with that he also points out the weaknesses of the Ibo community and point out where they really need changes.
Achebe gives exposure to his culture, which had….


 The great culture of Ibo community is an example in itself and how it is disturbed and disintegrated by the British imperialism and by missionaries. Various interpretation of the title Things fall apart are like   

“Things begin to fall apart in these nine villages Umuofia clan long before European colonist missionary culture inserts itself there.”
“When he accidently kills a clan man, things begin to fall apart in life of Okonkwo.
“So when some members of the Umuofia community unwittingly accepted the invitation and endorsed “strange faith” things fall apart for the Igbo people in Achebe’s novel.”

Achebe tried to show his own people the greatness and dignity of their culture which they have lost during the colonial period in his work Anthills of the savannah 1987 he wrote

“Igbo, had a philosophy of great depth and value and beauty that they had poetry above all they had dignity.” (Nnoromele, 2000)
This novel we have various pictures of Igbo society at the end of the 19th century. Achebe presented to the word the positive as well as negative sides of the Igbo people .he discussed Igbo‘s customs, their political structure religions seasonal festival and ceremonies. In his comment on the novel,  Achebe said “the characters are normal people and their events are real human events”

Things Fall Apart is savage and tender; it blister with wit and radiates with the inner glow of hard earned compassion. It is disillusioned but passionately engaged solemn while being exuberant it is polemical but wise. There is not a shred of the congeal violence of cheap sentimentality: Achebe’s characters do not seek our permission to be human, they do not apologize for being complex.” (Achebe, 2001)

      Democratic system of government

Collective will

Tolerant of other culture

Forbid on killing each other

Igbos does not fight with each other because they are primitive, but because it’s a matter of existence in Nigeria thus there raise need of war as a matter of survival. The land in Nigeria is rocky and very poor and thus it could not support large number of people. Planting soon depleted and so villagers were forced to move further and further afield to find land which would high support them to continue life. As the population of Nigeria increased land and food were insufficient to provide everyone. The novel seems to map the turning point in the alteration from plenty to scarcity. Some times between generation of Okonkwo and his uncle Uchendu speaks of “the good days when a man had friends in distant clans nobody like fight” but at list it provides means of preservation. Some wars are inevitable if the clan is to survive “Neighboring clans try to avoid war with Umuofia because it is feared as a village powerfully war”

      Religion

Religion is a factor both in limiting war and supporting it when it is just. Igbo had a develop system of religion which works as effectively as Christianity. In a matter of religion, Achebe has given a close comparison between Christianity and Igbo religion. Before the British there was only religion in clan that was Igbo. But now they have to religion and both supports morality. For British it seems crazy to worship wooden idols as in chapter 19th Mr. Brown says “you carve piece of would like that one, and you call it a god. But it is still a piece of wood.” (Achebe, 2001) and for Igbos it seems crazy to say that god has a son when he has no wife “you told us with your mouth that there was only a god. And now you talk about his son. He must have wife then.” (Achebe, 2001)

Both system of religion believe in only a one supreme god and both gods have messenger on earth. Supreme god or Umuofia is Chukwu and wooden idols are messenger of god for Igbos. With that it is also true that each member of the clan has its own personal god whom the call Chi- Luck. Whereas for Christianity there is one god, and Jesus Christ is the son of god and messenger of god. Both religion supports humanity and humility. Igbo speak to god through messenger because they do not want to worry the master, but they deal with Chukwu directly if all else fails. Both gods are vengeful only when disregarded. If person disobeys Chukwu, the god is to be feared, but Chukwu “need not to be feared by those who do his wills.” (Achebe, 2001) The good things about the Ibos in matter of religion is that they do not fight on the name of the god, as Christianity has killed more people on the name of crusade than any wars by Igbo. Achebe makes it clear that the demoralizing state of the political affairs in Africa is the result of European interference rather than simply the natural outgrown culture. (Rhoads, 1996)

      System of justice

Consist of nine Egwagwu each of the nine represents a village of the clam” one of the greatest crime man could commit was to unmask an Egwagwu in public “Igbos have a well established and effective system of district commissioner and court messengers. Dispute in clam which is not solved by each other then they can go before Egwugwu the greatest masked  spirits of the clan, played by the titled villagers. They hears and witness from both sides and give decision for example in novel we have..

in chapter ten – in case of Uzowoli, who beat his wife and his wife and children had gone away. In this matter Igwagwu try to assuage each side.

They warn and suggests Uzowoli “go to your in-laws with a pot of wine and beg your wife to return to you. It is not bravery when a man fights with a woman.” Here we discover two things at once that Egwagwu settles this types of disputes in clan with that we come to know about the a custom of wine pot in exchange of  woman. The duty of the Ewugwu is as Evil Forest says “our duty is not to blame this man or to praise that but to settle the dispute”

Okonkwo's gun accidently discharged and killed the son of Ezeudu. Even though this was an accident, it was viewed as an abomination in the land, for under no circumstances would someone kill a clansman. And according to the rules of the clan Okonkwo and his family has to leave in exile for seven years.

Igbo considered suicide as a worst crime against life, and it is unforgivable, no one dare to touch the body of the person, the funeral or burial is not given to the dead one. Even the family members or friends are not ready to touch Okonkwo’s body "That man was one of the greatest men in Umuofia. You drove him to kill himself and now he will be buried like a dog...”

  Week of peace

The life in Nigeria requires war like men for the survival of the clan. But the clan also knows how to control the war like spirits and anger of the men. For that Igbo decided to celebrate the week of the peace it’s a kind of the way to control these men. During the week of peace it was convinced to all that no violence should be allowed in clan even domestic violence is also not allowed. Though the men in clan must be the warrior and fierce to their enemy, but gentle to his own people. 

“Killing a member of his own clan is forbidden.”

“Okonkwo broke the week of peace, and was punished” on one afternoon in anger he had forgotten that it was the week of peace and beat her wife very heavily. It was forbidden even to beat family member however sever crime one has committed. When he violated the peace week by beating his youngest wife, which was an offense to the goddess, Okonkwo agreed to make offerings as demanded by the custom of Umuofia. In fact, he offered an additional pot of palm-wine, which was a distinct indication of genuine repentance and cooperation for the good of the community

Combination of Male and Female principles

The male is strong and war like and female is tender and supportive in times of adversity. Uncle Uchendu explains his explication of saying “Mother is the supreme.”

"It's true that a child belongs to its father. But when a father beats his child, it seeks sympathy in its mother's hut. A man belongs to his fatherland when things are good and life is sweet. But when there is sorrow and bitterness he finds refuge in his motherland. Your mother is there to protect you. She is buried there. And that is why we say that mother is supreme.” (Achebe, 2001)

In Igbo Culture the earth goddess acts as counter balance to male strength. Yet Igbos have not achieved the ideal balance of male and female. But they have control over the abusing of woman by man and even domestic violence is no longer regarded as virtue. Even in clan we find some elements which see male and female as equal. For instance tribe says that it is not bravery to fight with a woman, even Achebe depicts in-laws as objecting to treatment of a wife and as action to prevent domestic violence. Igbo includes men like Ndulue who treats their wives as equals: about Ndulue and his wife “it was always said that Ndulue and Ozoemena had one mind”. “he could not do anything without telling her” though many people in the clan sees him as weak. But by giving such example Achebe indirectly suggests that this is the great warrior whom the rest of tribe should admire. And that is the way to bring equality in society.

In contrasts to Ndulue there is aso men like Okonkwo whose war like anger makes them dangerous for the peace. For he is harsh with his children and wives, he often beats his wives to prove his strength. Even more in that cruelty he kills Ikmefuna only because he is afraid of being thought like his father. “his whole life was dominated by fear the fear of Failure and weakness.”

Even during the week of peace he beats his wife without any kind of fear not even goddess. Okonkwo’s friend Oberika sees “Okonkwo’s part in killing Ikmefuna’s death as crime against earth it is the kind of action for which the goddess wipes out the whole families.” And we see Okonkwo’s tragic destruction at the end of his life, the imposition ofone culture, social, political structure upon another and thus he had to kill himself.    

Economic system-

The Igbos have an economic system which redistributes wealth among the people to prevent supremacy of man over the wealth. In order to take any titles of the clan, a man has to give up a portion of the wealth to clan. Idemili title is the highest title in the land and most expensive too.

  Arts and Poetry

Achebe introduces various arts of the Ibos during the course of the novel. The chief among them are poetry, music, flute playing, decoration of walls and body, shaving hair patterns in various ceremonies. Music and dancing are the part of Igbo rituals. Story telling becomes means of inciting men to strength, of teaching about gods, or generally passing the culture.

Okonkwo encouraged his children with masculine and bloodshed stories, while the mother tells stories of animals and gods.

Igbos makes very good use of proverbs to show respect and wit in conversations Achebe says ‘for Igbos proverbs are the palm oil with which words are eaten.”
Some of the well known proverbs used in the novel are

“the sun will shine on those who stand before it shine on those who kneels under them”

To explain his culture Achebe use proverb “as elder said if a child washed hands he could eat with kings.” (Achebe, 2001) This proverb is the emblem of the Igbo’s culture, it says through the hard work even a person like Okonkwo can overcome his father’s ill repute to make himself “one of the greatest man of his time.” Proverbs also helps to sustain morality and virtue in tribe which is the backbone of the culture.

The system and institutions of the Igbos are not rigid like that of Britishers which do not allow any kind of change. Ibo culture allows changes where they needed and is progressive towards change. It has made many changes in the old, unnecessary, cruel, and unwanted customs for instance

“My father told me that he had been told that in the past a man who broke the peace was dragged on the ground through the village until he died. But after a while this custom was stopped because it spoiled the peace which it was meant to preserve." (Achebe, 2001)     

  Why Bruisers were able to destroy the old Igbo culture

Those who converts initially were those who have not been fully incorporated into clan life. The first woman who convert is a woman who four times gave birth to twins and thrown away just because of Igbo believe twin child as devils or ghost, which will bring destruction to the society. But Christianity accepts a woman with twins. Outcasts, osu, and down trodden of the society sees that Christianity receives twins and thus they will also receives them also. Other like Nwoye, who bored of his father’s harsh behavior and shocked by the murder of Ikmefuna finds brotherhood in poetry of Christianity. This passage is taken from the end of Chapter 20 during the conversation between Obierika and Okonkwo

“Does the white man understand our custom about land?” “How can he when he does not even speak our tongue? But he says that our customs are bad; and our own brothers who have taken up his religion also say that our customs are bad. How do you think we can fight when our own brothers have turned against us? The white man is very clever. He came quietly and peaceably with his religion. We were amused at his foolishness and allowed him to stay. Now he has won our brothers, and our clan can no longer act like one. He has put a knife on the things that held us together and we have fallen apart.” (p. 129)

This entire paragraph can be seen as Achebe’s views on the colonialism.

To conclude this discussion on the culture, Igbo like any other culture in the world has its own reputation. And we can see the culture in better way to being in culture. Achebe has presented his culture to the world through the language which is not his own. Like many other cultures Igbo has its strength and weakness too. If the Igbos are not civilized than still there is culture with which they were and are living, but the intervention of the Christianity has fractured the integrity, unity, dignity, pride. Oberika rightly observed “Now he has won our brothers, and our clan can no longer act like one. He has put a knife on the things that held us together and we have fallen apart.” (p. 129)

("To evaluate my assignment, click here")

Works Cited

Achebe, C. (2001). Things Fall Apart. London, 80 strand,, England: penguin Classics.
Nnoromele, P. C. (2000). Jstore. Retrieved March 13, 2016, from http://www.jstor.org: http://www.jstor.org/stable/25112519
Rhoads, D. A. (1996, september). jstore. Retrieved march 13, 2016, from Jstore: http://www.jstor.org/stable/524733
Wikipedia. (n.d.). Wikipedia.org. (Wikipedia, Editor) Retrieved march 17, 2016, from www.wikipedia.org: http://en.wikipedia.org/Things_Fall_Apart


 
   


Saturday, 31 October 2015

Puritan society in The Scarlet Letter

("To evaluate my assignment, click here")

Name:- Parmar Milankumar
Semester-: Third
Batch Year:- 2014-16
Enrolment no.-: 14101026
Paper no.-: 10- American Literature
Submitted to-           Dr. Dilip Barad
                                    Smt. S B Gardi
                                    Department of English

Introduction

‘The Scarlet Letter’ is written by American writer Nathaniel Hawthorne. Nathaniel Hawthorne was born on 4th July 1804. The publication of this work earn him place among the literary writer of great importance. He had a great ability of character drawing, and his powerful way of unfolding a story and his interesting though quaint style have all contributed to his greatness as a novelist. One of the greatest quality of his is depiction of the effect of sin on human psyche.

            Hawthorne has contributed much to the fiction of America he is remembered today as the author of ‘The Scarlet Letter’. This work had great influence on later written literature in America and it had described as the “greatest novel/book ever written in the western Hampshire.”

In 1846 Hawthorne was appointed as “surveyor” for the district of Salem and Beverly and inspector of revenue for the port of Salem. His experience during that time provided him some inspiration and material which he later used in the “Custom House” section of The Scarlet Letter.

Hawthorne’s ancestors were puritan thus he had deep relation as well as influence over the personality and mind of the author. This work has given balanced importance in emphasizing the weakness as well as strength of his ancestors. Puritan’s were marked for their rigid and oppressive attitude. The Scarlet Letter can be read as Hawthorn’s attitude towards puritans of Briton. It is the society which makes characters like Hester, Chillingworth and Dimesdale suffers.

The Scarlet Letter takes us back to the early days of the puritan settlement at Massachusetts. The book derives its title from the custom strictly practiced by puritan settlers that a woman caught in act of adultery was wear to the letter “A” embroidered in scarlet on her dress. So let’s discuss the Puritan society and their way of living, their social systems as represented in “The Scarlet Letter.”

History of Puritans in New England:-

The early puritans who came to America in 1620 founded a precarious colony in Playmouth, and with that they established a society there.  They formed certain rules and regulations to keep society in order and to stop and to control the attacks made by Indian were living there already. And the novel set its place in this society.

A society is constructed through many things in which some institutions like religion plays vital role I the proper functioning of the society.  Puritan society is full of beliefs and misbelieves in their religion. Puritan society was purely based on religion and God remain at the center of their everyday life.

Man God and Salvation

These early puritans were following the writings of a French protestant reformer named John Calvin whose teaching saw the world as a grim conflict between good and evil, God and Satan. Thus puritans believed that there is a strong relation between God and individual. They were very introspective and they constantly search for the evidence of elect of god in their soul, those who have were chosen people by god for salvation. According to them a merciful God had sent his son Jesus Christ to to the earth to die for the sin of man, but only few would be saved.

            Throughout the novel characters like Dimesdale, Mr. Wilson is constantly trying to find that element within their soul. Dimesdale constantly give sermons and speeches to young and middle age people about the god. John Wilson who is a historical character and he was “The eldest Clergyman of Boston” who following Hester’s refusal to name of Pearl’s Father, he delivers a long sermon on the sin of adultery to the crowd that has gathered to witness Hester’s trial.

            Dimesdale with the belief of Element and because of that he could not accept Hester. And for that he tries to justify his decision to keep his guilt secret on the grounds that some men retains  “a zeal for God’s glory and man’s welfare” and that further service to God and his fellow creatures he and men like him must of necessity suffer “unbearable torment”.


Church State Common man

In puritan society only who were male and members of the church could vote. In addition ministers guided the elected officials of the colony; consequently there was close tie between church and state.



In The Scarlet Letter those two branches of government are presented by Mr. Roger Wilson who represents Church and Governor of Bellingham represents State.
The rules governing the puritans came from The Bible a source of spiritual and ethical standards. These rules were definite and the penalties or punishments were public and severe.

These stern and introspective puritans provided a rigid structure that was repressive to individual but that enabled the society/colony to survive those early years when order and faith needed.

Crime sin and punishment

            The puritan society strongly believed in the Bible and its way of living life, they had formed the legal system based on that, with that they made clear rules for certain crimes and these rules and crimes and sin to be avoided are preached in public sermons. As it was just after the Hester’s punishment sermon summoned by John Wilson.        

There was different punishment for different crimes. It was made clear to the society that what sin is. Every member of the society has to follow the commandments which were written in the Bible and those who disregarded to the laws of the society were banished, persecuted, and in some cases executed.

At very first chapter of the novel we see the protagonist Hester Prynne standing on the scaffold and facing the huge crowd. It signifies she had committed some kind of crime, she has violated the law of the society and thus she had been brought there for punishment. She faced public shame and further punishments were decided by states man and religious people.  

            We come to know that she has committed the crime of adultery, as one of the commandments written in Bible is that “thou shalt not commit adultery”. It is god’s seventh commandment. And those who violet it are sinners, so the scarlet letter is a story of sin. And that is why Hester and Dimesdale who commit this sin could not be forgiven.

Thus Hester given punishment to wear letter “A” on her bosom/ bodice of her dress and that is what the title of the novel symbolizes. Similarly if someone commits crime like murder then he or she has to wear the letter “M” one ones bosom.
         
   The practice of black magic believed to be worst kind of the sins in puritan society as in novel these practices were executed by character like Chillingworth. Hawthorne believed that the greatest sin of all is “the violation of another soul, another heart, simply for the purpose of finding out how it would react”.  And that is what Chillingworth was trying to do with Dimesdale, but he is not punished because it remained private till his death.
          
  One more belief about sin is those who know witchcrafts and if puritan found anyone under the influence of that then their name would be written in “Black man’s Diary”. Forest was believed as place for practicing witchcraft. One of the minor character Miss Hibbins sister of Governor found to be written her name in the “Black man’s Diary” and in history she was executed as witch.
Individual vs Puritan society   

Society is constructed to keep individual together many individual makes a society. Society is made from an individual but it is not from an individual’s perspective.  In the process of creating and maintaining the society an individual has to go through acute pain, where one has to continuously sacrifice his or her own desires and wish. 

 Each and every society has its own rules, notion and regulation and ideology to keep society in good order. But when these orders and laws violated- obviously it would be from an individual, thus one has to be ready to pay for it. And it is Puritan society in the novel and thus there is no scope for an individual.

            Hester, Pearl, Dimesdale, and Chillingworth suffers in this Puritan world because of the rigidity of the society, no doubt individual too is responsible for the suffering. But in both the cased society is more responsible.


 Hester and Dimesdale Suffers because puritans have made rule that a religious man could not marry, this is forbidden to them. Thus Dimesdal could not accept Hester publically. He only could accept at the end of his life and even end of the novel too. If this types of rules were not in society then it would have end up differently.

             The problems of Hester come from society she has been living in Boston since two years, whose husband sent her there two years before. It is clear from the beginning of the novel that she has nothing to do with her husband and her marriage with Chillingworth was not less than a disaster in her life.

            In both the cases to keep order in the society individuals were sacrificed. Even in Indian culture still we do believe in marriage as a holy connection, and in must be kept till the death. At present in India many Hesters are suffering the movie by Farhan Akhtar “Dil Dhadakne do“ portrayed the condition of women in Indian society very well.

           
Only some extra ordinary individuals can raise voice and go against chains of the society Hester is one of them, she had faith on herself, her strong individualism, her passion and desires helped her to dismantle the chains. With all these things she is able to tackle every obstacle that society throws at her. At the Scaffold scene when she was asked to speak the name of the fellow sinner thus child would get the father. In an answer of this she replied “my child must seek a heavenly father; she shall never know any earthly one”. This shows her strong individualism that she doesn’t need anybody now.  She will live her life in her way, she can nourish and cherish her child without help from anyone. And because of her strong individualism the sign of “A” frequently changes its meaning.

Conclusion:-
However the well framed a society is but still it has some problems in its own. Here the puritan society doing well in laws and social order but it had its own lacks like it failed to keep each and every individual happy, even in the matter of laws everybody/sinners didn’t punished. Some criminals were remained private like Dimesdale and Chillingworth both had committed sin and crime but puritan laws failed to do that as they both died before their crimes come to public. And individual like Hester will suffer in that society.  

("To evaluate my assignment, click here")

Works Cited
SparkNotes Editors. “SparkNote on The Scarlet Letter.” SparkNotes.com. SparkNotes LLC. 2003. Web. 23 Oct. 2015.
Dibble, Terry J.The Scarlet Letter. New Delhi: Kalyani, 199.


Friday, 30 October 2015

Critical Analysis on" Imaginary Homelands"- Salman Rushdie


("To evaluate my assignment, click here")

Name:-ParmarMilankumar L.

Roll. No.:- 16

Enrollment no:- 14101026

Subject:- Post-colonial Literature

Topic:- Critical Analysis on 'Imaginary Homelands' by Salman Rushdie

Submitted to:- Dr. Dilip Barad

                        Department of English,

                        M.K.B.U. Bhavnagar.


INTRODUCTION-:
Salman Rushdie is the most controversial writer among Indian writing in English. His book published under the title “Imaginary Homeland” is the collection of the essay written between 1981 and 1992. All the essays are based on Salman Rushdie’s experience of the contemporary time scenario. This book is the collection of the controversial issues of the decade. In those days Indira Gandhi was the prime minister of India.

            “This book is an incomplete, personal view of the interregnum of 1980s, not all of whose symptoms it has to be said, were morbid.” (introduction-1) It clearly says that all are his personal views that may be are may not be completely right, according to him it was a decade, what Gramsci has said “the old was dying and yet new could not be born.” (Rushdie, 1992)

            His first glorious work was ‘Midnight’s Children’, it was for the first-time people liked his book, before that he had published ‘Grimus’. Then in the year 1988 he published his most controversial work ‘Satanic Verses’.

            The seed of the imaginary homelands were sawn in the Indo-Anglian seminar at London, where mighty pens of Indian English writing were present. Rushdie was excited to listen to them but soon he realized that some of the participants’ “the desire to describe Indian culture-which I had always thought of rich mixture of tradition-in exclusive, and excluding, Hindu terms” (2.pg)

In this session one of the novelist whose name Rushdie did not revealed, begun his contribution by reciting a Sanskrit Shloka, and then, instead of translating the verse he declared.
“Every educated Indian will understand what I have just said”. It is stupid way in the room were Indian writers and scholar coming from conceivable backgrounds, like Christian, Parasi, Muslim, Sikh. None of them rose in Sanskrit tradition and they were reasonably educated. The question surrounded his minds were

-what were we being told?
-we aren’t Indian’?
The second day, an eminent Indian academic delivered a paper on Indian culture that utterly ignored all minority communities, and he presented “then characterization of Muslim culture as imperialist and inauthentic, this made him write a book, in order to search for his ‘existence. For him the conference was a bitter experience which was pricking him like a thorn.’(2.pg).

The book ‘Imaginary Homelands’ divided into six sections. They are.
1) Midnight’s children.
2) Politics of India and Pakistan.
3) Indo-Anglian literature.
4) Movie and Television.
5) Experience of migrants, -Indian migrants to Britain.
6) Thatcher/ flout election –question of Palestine

“IMAGINARY HOMELANDS”
This essay was written after the publication of the Midnight’s Children. This never was well responded in western countries but, in Indian it was rejected by Indians, and it was a request from a diasporic writer to the country of his origin to accept him.

It is written out of anguish to go to the roots of one’s origin. The desire of belonging to somewhere, it is the desire of an individual to claim a country as his/her homeland.  So, let’s analyze the essay in detail.

Problems with ‘Midnight’s Children’
Rushdie starts his essay with a photograph which was taken in 1946 before his birth in India. This photo was an inspiration for the novel ‘Midnight’s Children’. When he was writing ‘Midnight’s Children’ very far from India, it is India from macrocosm view. He says. “it may be that writers in position exiles or emigrants or expatriates, are haunted by some sense of loss. The physical alienation from India almost inevitably means that we will not be capable of reclaiming precisely the thing that was lost; that we will in short create fiction, not actual cities or villages, but invisible ones, imaginary homeland, India in mind.” (10.pg) Further he declares that

“What he was actually doing was a novel of memory and about the memory.” Thus, it is India of his memory and of his perspective. There he presented his version of India. Presentation of the dark picture and political matter in ‘Midnight’s Children’ drags the work in political controversy. And as an answer to that he gives explanation.

“I wasn’t trying to write about the emergency in the same way as I wrote about event halt a century earliest. I felt it would be dishonest to pretend, when writing about the day before yesterday, that it was possible to see the whole picture. I showed certain blobs and slabs of the scene.”

            Further he takes support of playwright for the justification of his act, he writes, the description itself is a political act, and for him “politician and writers are natural rivals. Both groups try to make the world in their own image; they fight for the same territory and the novel is one way of denying the official, politicians’ version of truth.”  (14.pg)

Another point which increases the complexity of the controversy is that the description of India that Midnight’s Children attempts, is very pessimistic. Thus, it is critical in India for its despairing tone. But he denied that the book is not despairing or nihilistic, rather he would say “he tried to set up a tension in the text, a paradoxical opposition between form and content of the narrative. The story of Saleem does indeed lead him to despair. But the story is told in a manner designed to echo, as closely my abilities allowed, the nonstop regeneration. The form of the story is optimistic.
In response to the argument that he had portrayed India in bad light. He gives excellent answer to the riddle. He said ‘It is rater a postcolonial (rejecting the British notion of writing) voice he tried to claim by this work but in country like India these things remain unnoticed. They only like “Shining India”. The form and the manner of telling story is itself rejecting the traditional way of writing novel. It is the Indian talent rejecting the colonial way and norms of writing, as he makes use of memory which itself is not reliable, the use of magic realism which give a new spark to story, the use of telepathy it takes us back to the ancient India.

In concluding his view on the ‘Midnight’s Children’, he gives answer to the last question which I like the most. The question is for whom he is writing? he says, “I never had reader in mind. I have ideas, people, events, shapes, and I write for those things, and hope completed work will be interest of others. (20.pg) he clearly says about ‘Midnight’s Children’ for whom it was written. He felt that if its sub-continental rejected the work, he should have thought it as a failure, no matter what the reaction in the west. So, it becomes clear that he is writing for the people who feel the part of the things he had write about, but also for everyone else up to whom his work can reach.

Diaspora -:
‘Imaginary Homelands’ is all about the feeling of belonging nowhere.  The Feeling of insecurity always remains there in his mind which got reflected in his work. His life experience as always, a member of marginalized group, member of Indian Muslim family in Bombay, then as Pakistani, and as present time as British Asian. Thus, there is not a fix identity/root which he can claim. Even in Britan he is not accepted as a member of that country. His experience is no better as he wrote in his essay titled ‘New Empire Within New Britan.’

In creating a story like ‘Midnight’s Children’ he is in a way trying to establishing relationship or making a proof that even he has a land somewhere he belongs to. As he writes “I too had a city and a history to reclaim”. For writers like him, who are exiled, emigrants, or expatriates, are haunted by some sense of loss, some urge to reclaim, to look back, even at the risk of being mutilated pillars of salt.” He rightly points out that he knows that the feeling of belonging is just momentary for writers like him and soon it will wash out, but still they take risk at list temporary they felt they exist.

Diasporic writers held up in such situation that they wish but they could not claim their belonging to the country once they leaved or forced to leave. And they even could not completely mingle with the new one, as the memory of the past doesn’t allow them to accept it. They held up between two cultures, two languages, two nations, and lost identity. He declared that to live in British society is to face everyday problems of definition

What does it mean to be an Indian outside India?
How can culture be preserved without become ossified?
How to change without seeming to play into the hands of our racial enemies?
How to turn away our self which one goes to another country?
How are we to live in the world?

Conclusion: -
A work of literature is an expression of feeling, experience, but it doesn’t mean to force him to leave the country, we Indian really need to understand it that the freedom of thinking can bring better life in society by the writer and free thinkers like Salman Rushdie. In the conclusion of the essay, as a radical thinker he compared a writer within himself with a dog from the novel “The Dean’s December”, as barking of the dog protagonist Dean imagine dogs’ barking as protest against his limit of experience.  “for god’s sake the dog is saying open the universe a little more”. It is the limitation of the diasporic writers that they were protesting, what they really want is to be accepted as a human being, they need little more freedom of expression, and we have to accept them as they belong to somewhere


Works Cited
Rushdie, S. (1992). Imaginary Homelands. In S. Rushdie, Imaginary Homelands (pp. 1-25). London.


 ("To evaluate my assignment, click here")